Skanska rail and highways maintenance for sale

Skanska is pulling out of the rail, highways and lighting maintenance markets to concentrate on core building and infrastructure construction.

It has now begun the process of marketing its infrastructure services operations to potential buyers.

Skanska said it would only consider bids that protect contract delivery and teams.

Gregor Craig, president and CEO of Skanska UK, said: “We have a strong platform for the future as a result of our financial resilience, selective work winning and disciplined management.

“We have decided to streamline our UK operations to focus more on our core infrastructure and building markets and create greater alignment between Skanska’s UK activities and its approach in global markets.”

Skanska said it would remain fully committed to the delivery of all current contracts throughout the sale process, and would do all it could to minimise any impact and ensure a seamless transition once a buyer is identified.

 

It is the second time the UK arm of the Swedish construction giant has sought to sell part of its business.

Nearly two years ago piling arm Skanska Cementation was marketed with a price tag north of £50m. But after failing to agree on a price with prospective buyer concrete contractor Morrisroe, the foundation firm was retained.

The government has launched a review of freelance tax rule changes due to come into force in April

Looming changes to IR35 rules are causing widespread concern in construction.

HMRC rules are due to change from April 6 making contractors liable for determining the tax status of off-payroll professionals.

Major contractors have been auditing freelancers employed via personal service companies as thousands of professionals are braced for a move back to PAYE.

The government is now calling for evidence from affected individuals and businesses to ensure “smooth implementation of the reforms.”

Financial Secretary to the Treasury Jesse Norman said: “We recognise that concerns have been raised about the forthcoming reforms to the off-payroll working rules.

“The purpose of this consultation is to make sure that the implementation of these changes in April is as smooth as possible.”

Current rules allow workers to be employed via a personal service company (PSC) which determines whether IR35 tax rules should apply.

That responsibility is due to shift from April to contractors who will determine employment status.

Freelance workers fear they will lose out through higher tax payments while contractors will also face bigger bills from direct employment.

The government is also reviewing its Check Employment Status for Tax (CEST) online tool which has attracted widespread criticism.

Chancellor Pledges Review of IR35 Changes

Chancellor Sajid Javid is promising to review looming freelance tax rule changes which are causing widespread concern in construction.

HMRC IR35 rules are due to change next April making contractors liable for determining the tax status of off-payroll professionals.

Major contractors have been auditing freelancers employed via personal service companies as thousands of professionals are braced for a move back to PAYE.

But Javid told the BBC Radio 4’s Money Box programme “We’ve already said that we’re on the side of self-employed people.

‘We will be having a review and I think it makes sense to include IR35 in that review.”

Current rules allow workers to be employed via a personal service company (PSC) which determines whether IR35 tax rules should apply.

That responsibility is due to shift from April to contractors who will determine employment status.

Freelance workers fear they will lose out through higher tax payments while contractors will also face bigger bills from direct employment.

One industry expert said: “They are desperate for any vote they can get so alienating a million freelancers is not a good idea.”

HS2 review ‘could axe part of northern route’

HS2-High-Speed-2-train-track-design-CGI-_660-620x330.jpg

The northern leg of HS2 could be scaled back, it has been reported.

The Financial Times said that the Oakervee review is examining the possibility of axing phase 2b of the route from the East Midlands to Leeds and Sheffield.

The review is assessing factors including whether the project should continue, what its cost will be and the route it should take.

Leeds City Council leader Judith Blake said: “There will be grave long-term consequences for the economy of the north and east of the UK if the eastern leg of HS2 isn’t delivered in full.”

The FT also reported that the panel is also looking at cutting the speed of the trains by 40mph in an attempt to save £10bn, and looking at starting the line at Old Oak Common rather than Euston.

Labour peer and former head of the National Infrastructure Commission Lord Andrew Adonis said he would try to ask about the reported change in the House of Lords this afternoon.

He said: “I’m hoping to ask in the House of Lords today about the front page suggesting that the eastern leg of HS2 to Leeds, Sheffield, Nottingham & Derby might be cancelled. This is a really terrible idea even by Johnson’s standards.”

A report by Midlands Connect last month said that 73 stations, including 54 with no direct HS2 service, are set to benefit from the project if it is completed in full.

At the time, Sir John Peace said: “It is the capacity released by the line, not just its speed, that will give the whole network a desperately needed overhaul.”

HS2 confirmed last week that it has halted the felling of 11 ancient woodland sites until the Oakervee-led review has concluded.

The panel is expected to conclude its report later this month.

A spokesperson for the Department for Transport said: “We are not going to pre-empt or prejudice this work with a running commentary on the review’s progress.”

HS2 has been contacted for comment.

Skanska prepares for world record pipe-jacking task

A Skanska-led joint venture is starting to prepare the way for a record-breaking pipeline push 30m below the River Humber for National Grid.

Eight 610m sections of concrete cased pipes will be pushed through Humber River tunnel
The firm has just completed the 18-month first stage tunnel drive for the £100m gas transportation project slightly behind programme.

Now preparation work is getting underway to attempt the challenging pipe-jacking feat.

This will involve painstakingly pushing eight, 610m sections of pipe at about one metre a minute through the 5km tunnel.

Before the two hydraulic thrust machines start the epic task next spring, the team must first dismantle the 3.65m diameter TBM Mary.

Steve Ellison, lead project manager of Capital Delivery at National Grid, said: “It’s the first time a tunnel has been constructed beneath the River Humber and a fantastic achievement for everyone involved.

“Over the next few weeks we’ll be dismantling the tunnel boring machine and lifting her out of the ground in sections, ready to be transported back to Germany, where as much as possible will be refurbished and renewed to get her ready for her next tunnelling job.

“The next steps for us here under the Humber involve clearing the pipes, cables and ancillary equipment that has been servicing the tunnel boring machine and preparing for the world record-breaking pipeline installation early next year.”

Hydraulic thrusters will be installed at the Goxhill site on south side of river for the epic pipeline push

The 850-tonne sections of pipe will be pushed on rollers into the new tunnel from Goxhill on the south side. To aid installation the tunnel will be flooded with water.

When one pipe section has been installed, the next will be moved into position, welded to the one in front, and the push will continue until all of the pipeline is installed beneath the river.

When complete it will be the longest hydraulically inserted pipe in the world.

Counter Offers: To Stay or Not to Stay?

For those unfamiliar with the basic definition; the counter offer is a last-minute bid by a company to retain an employee who has handed in a notice of resignation.

Over the years we have seen many a counter offer put on the table from frantic employers and in this article, we are going to cover both the positives and negatives of accepting; whilst shining some light on the subject.

And In the famous words of The Clash, “Should I stay or should I go now?”

What is a Counter Offer?

A counter offer is an attempt to entice an employee to stay with their employer after they have received an offer for another job position. The counter offer can consist of a raise to salary, an increased benefits package (company car, bonus, etc.), a promotion or new role within the company or just a few words of reassurance and promises of a brighter future. This is done in the hope that this increased ‘deal’ will change the employee’s mind and get them to stay.

Pros of Accepting a Counter Offer

  • The straightest forward counter offer is financial and this tends to benefit employees who are generally happy with their job but feel they are being financially undervalued. This can be resolved by their employer increasing the employee’s annual salary or some of the other financial benefits.
  • If the dissatisfaction runs deeper and is widely felt then a benefit of a long-term, highly regarded employee resigning their post is that it can give a wakeup call to their employer which can lead to change that, not only benefits the individual, but also the overall team. Whilst no one person is bigger than a company, losing key staff can be very disruptive and costly so making a few changes to improve the general feeling can be a benefit to both employer and the team.
  • Where the issue goes beyond finance and self-worth then the employee may be looking for more responsibility and a new challenge. When recruiting, the natural tendency for many employers is to look outside whilst overlooking existing staff who may have transferable skills. A resignation could, therefore, start talks regarding a step up or it could open doors to new responsibilities whilst putting plans in place for further career progression. This can leave the employee in a better position, knowing that their aspirations are being considered and that there is potential to progress within the company.

Cons of Accepting a Counter Offer

  • Financial gain tends to be short-lived once the shine of an increased salary wears off and the extra money has been absorbed into our daily living. Once this happens the other reasons for our dissatisfaction starts to resurface and it’s only a matter of time before we are scrolling through the job advertisements again. Statistically, over 70% of people who accept a financial counter offer start looking for a new job within six months either because of their renewed unease or (in recessionary times) an unexpected redundancy notice.
  • However well regarded an employee is, they are rarely viewed the same by an employer after a counter offer, who may now feel let-down at having been put in that position; and who may forever question the employee’s loyalty. This often shows up when salary reviews, bonus payments and promotions come up; or when cut backs in the company occur.
  • Beware the promise of a brighter future that comes in the form of a promotion or new role ‘in six months’ time’ or ‘once your current project completes’. Talk is cheap and often the promise of change simply buys the employer time to plan for the employee’s departure and line up a replacement.
  • Even if a pay increase or promotion IS forthcoming then consider why it has only been offered in a last-minute bid to stop you from leaving rather than in authentic and planned recognition of your value to them. If your employer knew about your concerns or wanted to improve your circumstances then why did they leave it to such a late stage, and will it take another resignation to get that next increase? Similarly, how will your colleagues feel towards you knowing that you strong-armed your position?
  • For me, the biggest downside is often overlooked. To get to the resignation stage, it’s likely that you invested time in finding and interviewing for a position that you wanted, with a company that you liked; and to whom you suggested (at least verbally) that you would be accepting their offer. Companies rarely enjoy feeling as though their offers have been used and often disregard future applications from those that have ‘let them down’.

There are always pros and cons to decisions and sometimes a counter offer can occasionally be a great opportunity for change while often it’s a quick fix for 6 months before the original feelings return even stronger and it’s back to square one.

If you’re considering new opportunities then head over to our jobs page where you will find an extensive list of current available vacancies, alternatively call either our London or Midlands offices, we’d be pleased to hear from you.

 

Amey to pay £215m to exit Birmingham highways PFI

Amey is close to striking a deal that could see it stump up £215m to walk away from its troubled Birmingham highways maintenance PFI contract.

Birmingham City Council chiefs are understood to have agreed a proposal with the highways maintenance contractor, which will be formally ratified next month.

It is understood that Amey could pay £130m in cash up front, with a further £85m in staged payments over five years.

Also Birmingham City Council would hold £85m of deductions and penalties imposed on Amey, which have been subject to legal disputes between the two.

Together this would amount to a £300m divorce settlement for the council from Amey’s Spanish parent Ferrovial.

Amey has been locked in a five-year legal battle with the council over performance on its £2.7bn PFI deal. This has already seen Amey Highways suffer serious losses.

The Spanish infrastructure group is aiming to sell-off its UK support services business Amey but the 25-year PFI contract has proved a major obstacle.

A council spokesman would not confirm leaks to Sky News of the proposed deal but said:  “It is now generally accepted by all parties to the contract that in order to move forward Amey must be replaced with a new subcontractor.

“This will require a managed release and handover to a new provider along with an appropriate settlement to rectify the liabilities Amey proposes to leave behind.

“While the terms of this settlement are yet to be agreed and would be subject to further agreement by the Council’s Cabinet, talks in recent days have established how an acceptable settlement could be reached and we will continue to work with all those involved to achieve an acceptable solution.”

An Amey spokesman said: “We are encouraged by recent progress and appear to be arriving at a deliverable solution guaranteed by Amey.

“The next few days are critical to finally concluding this issue.”

Galliford Try issues profit warning

Galliford Try is undertaking a strategic review of its construction business after issuing a fresh profit warning.


Further hits have been distilled on the completed Queensferry Crossing

The firm said it aimed to reduce the size of the construction business as it focused on key strengths in markets with sustainable prospects for profitability and growth.

Galliford Try warned it expected to report pre-tax profits £30m-£40m below previous forecasts, after final settlement on the £1.4bn Queensferry Crossing project.

Galliford Try’s joint venture with Dragados, Hochtief and American Bridge International had to meet costs of delays due to high winds on the Forth bridge project.

In a statement it said:  “The board anticipates that this review will result in reduced profitability in the current year reflecting a reassessment of positions in legacy and some current contracts and the effect of some recent adverse settlements, as well as the costs of the restructure.”

It said the single largest readjustment related to the Queensferry Crossing joint venture, which has recently increased its estimated final costs on the project.

It said its position over the claim covering the completed Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route, and the £38m work in progress balance in respect of three contracts for a single client was unchanged.

The review will scrutinise contract positions throughout the construction business and assess operational progress. The outcome of the review over the next few weeks will be reported in a trading update in mid May.

Streetwork contractors to be made to give five-year pothole guarantees

The Department for Transport plans to make utilities contractors guarantee their reinstatement’s for five years.

Transport secretary Chris Grayling has launched a consultation on increasing the guarantee on utility firms’ roadworks form two years to five years, so that if a pothole forms as a result within five years, the company must return to bring the road surface back to normal.

The consultation seeks views on a new edition of the Specification for the reinstatement of openings in highways, a statutory code of practice for street works. It also introduces new asphalt standards.

Transport secretary Chris Grayling said: “Road surfaces can be made worse by utility companies, so imposing higher standards on repairs will help keep roads pothole-free for longer. The proposals also allow for new innovative surfacing to be used, such as asphalt with a high bitumen content that is easier to compact to the required density. This makes it less prone to potholing.”

Article Courtesy of ‘The Construction Index’